We might be able to start setting our
clocks by it: the annual mini-media spotlight on the question: Is there a real
catcher in baseball?
Last year, an Out magazine op-ed piece allegedly
written by the lover of a gay player ignited the fury. This year, it's another
New York based publication that dishes out a heavy dose of insinuation and
innuendo, and for a few days anyway, the NBA playoffs, NHL playoffs and
everything else in the sports world is on hold while we speculate on the answer
to The Biggest Question and Challenge in Professional Sports: Can naked grown
straight men function in the same enclosed space as naked grown not-so-straight
men?
Cue the speculation, theorizing and gay sports fans' hopeful
fantasies. Cue the homophobic players saying they're afraid to let anyone who's
gay see their penis. Or their backstops, for that matter (cause Lord knows, all
it takes is five seconds alone with a naked straight man to make him forget his
wife and/or girlfriend and switch to "our team." We're that persuasive or
they're that weak and inclined, take your pick). Cue the rumor mill. Cue the
denials. Cue Billy "Please Don't Hurt Me" Bean, our poster boy and media expert
when it comes to the subject of homos hiding out in pro sports.
Bean
became "a qualified expert" by default when he came out of the closet after his
short-lived baseball career, and to my knowledge, has never had anything
positive to say about the prospect of someone being same-gender loving in the
world of sports. His negative demeanor on the topic doesn't just cover the
prospect of someone being an active player and openly gay. No, sir, if you
listen to Doomsday Billy, a homo couldn't make it in pro sports in any capacity,
in or out, because there's just too much pressure to be a hetero pig with the
rest of the boys. If I were a young, gay or questioning kid with aspirations of
360 slam dunks or grand slam homers or hat tricks, I'd run the other way from
the playing fields after listening to Bean.
Could the dude be more
fatalistic?
If that's what his own experience was like, fine, but hey,
don't rain on everybody's parade. Attention, Billy: your experience as a queer
journeyman in baseball is not the sum total of all experiences by all homos in
sports. Common sense would dictate that, if nothing else. But not to CryBaby
Bean. Sometimes he sounds like the PR rep for an organization trying to keep
gays outta sports.
Maybe that's why he's the media darling; he helps them
feed on their fears.
With this latest flare-up of New York Met gossip,
expert Bean appeared on expert Jim Rome's show and reiterated what expert Bean
has said from Day One about gays in sports: Coming out and being da man in the
pros mixes like oil and water, like baseball contraction and good will, like the
Cleveland Cavaliers and wins.
"The people who run sports don't want
distractions," he told Romey.
People running sports don't want
distractions?
Since when is getting laid a distraction?
Since when
is loving with dignity a distraction?
Since when is being accepted and
respected for who you are a distraction?
People are fighting and dying
all over the world at this very moment because they want to be treated fairly
(whatever their version of "fairly" is).
SPORTS is the
distraction, CryBaby.
Halfway across the globe, young men (and women!)
are walking into bakeries and onto bus stops blowing up themselves and
strangers, and now, just about every security official in the US with something
at stake is warning us that that road show is coming our way sooner than Star
Wars III.
Yeah, it's nice for Shaq et al. to make millions dunking
baskets and pitching burgers and cheese fries, and therefore they gotta take
sports, e.g., their jobs, seriously if they want the dough. But children
starving, restaurant-goers exploding, people feeling generally alienated from
society for a billion reasons (AIDS, poverty, lack of affordable housing to name
a few)--that's the real world. The half-assed efforts these athletically gifted
men provide on the court and fields (see Chris Webber rebounding) is
NOT.
Sports is nothing BUT distraction, which is why it's only natural
and fitting that reporters have feeding frenzies over things like Chuck Finley
in a shoe fight with his skanky rocker wife; Michael's gambling ways; Ray
Lewis's borderline(?) criminal ways; Barry Bonds' and Mark McGwire's supplement
ways; Webber's model girlfriend; questions like, who's dating Toni Braxton?; who
shot the limo driver?; who punched whom in the locker room?; which French judge
made which deal?; which city gave out the best bribes to land an event?; and on
and on and on to the break of dawn.
Dear Crybaby: Don't try and tell us
there's no room for one more ring in the infinite ring circus that is
sports.
Dear Gay Man in Pro Sports Who Might Be Entertaining the Idea of
Going Public: Here's the best reason of all for you to come out: So we can fire
Doomsday Billy as our spokesperson.
http://www.outsports.com/columns/gaymetcittbean20020528.htm
Billy Bean Did the
Right Thing
Marginal Players Can Be Replaced
Easily
By Charlie in the
Trees
Outsports.com columnist
``I don't think any player would be
strong enough to handle that persecution, shrug it off, then deal with Randy
Johnson. The pressure would mount. It could be a frightening experience. I would
hate to see a great player screwed up without fully understanding the
ramifications.''
-- Billy Bean, quoted in USA Today (May 24,
2002)
Why is Billy Bean so pessimistic? Why does he think it would be
"professional suicide," in his words, for a major league baseball player to come
out as gay?
Because we all view everything through the prism of our of
own life experiences and it would have been professional suicide for a marginal,
journeymen outfielder to have come out as gay in the late `80s or early
`90s.
Bean's professional baseball career always had one foot in the
grave and the other on a banana peel. In seven major league seasons, his career
numbers were as follows:
272 games played (average: 38 per season)
487 at bats (average: 68 per season)
.266 on base percentage
.308 slugging percentage
.228 batting average
42 runs scored (average: 6 per season)
53 RBI (average: 8 per season)
5 home runs (all hit in 1993)
Bean's best season was 1993 with the Padres:
88 games played
177 at bats
.284 on base percentage
.395 slugging percentage
.260 batting average
19 runs scored
32 RBI
5 home runs
He did not have a superstar career. These
are not Hall of Fame numbers. He only had 487 at bats in his entire major league
career. Ichiro had 692 at bats last year alone.
Put Bean's numbers in
perspective. From 1987 to 1995, he was one of the 150 or so people best suited
to be a major league outfielder, in the whole world. But Bean's a bright guy. He
saw that the gap between himself and the next 150 best outfielders (all panting
for a shot in the majors in AAA ball) was a whole lot smaller than the gap
between himself and baseball's superstars. Like most of us in our jobs: he could
be replaced.
Let's do a comparison between Bean and three outfielders
whose 2001 seasons were most comparable to his 1993 season:
(1) Mark Smith, outfielder, Montreal Expos
Games played: 80 (- 8) compared with Bean's total of 88 in 1993
At bats: 194 (+ 17)
On base percentage: .326 (+ .042) Bean never drew walks
Slugging percentage: .412 (+ .017)
Batting average: .242 (-. 018)
Runs scored: 28 (+ 9)
Home runs: 6 (+ 1)
RBI: 18 (- 1)
(2) John Mabry, outfielder, Florida Marlins (82 games) and St. Louis Cardinals (5 games)
Games played: 87 (- 1)
At bats: 154 (- 23)
On base percentage: .287 (+ .003)
Slugging percentage: .370 (- .025)
Batting average: .208 (- .052)
Runs scored: 14 (- 5)
Home runs: 6 (+ 1)
RBI: 20 (+ 1)
(3) Mike Kinkade, outfielder, Baltimore Orioles:
Games played: 61 (- 27)
At bats: 160 (- 17)
On base percentage: .345 (+ .059)
Slugging percentage: .381 (- .014)
Batting average: .275 (+ .015)
Runs scored: 19 (even)
Home runs: 4 (- 1)
RBI: 16 (- 3)
Doubt that Bean could have been replaced
easily? Of those three, whose 2001 compare very favorably with Bean's best, only
John Mabry has played in the major leagues this season. Kinkade and Smith are
gone, even without the complication of coming out. Mabry, just traded from the
Philadelphia Phillies to the Oakland A's, has been averaging two teams per
season the last three years. And that's using Bean's best season.
It's
just as ugly if we use Bean's career averages. Comparing the three outfielders
whose 2001 numbers most closely mirrored Bean's career averages:
(1) Todd Dunwoody, outfielder, Chicago Cubs:
Games played: 33 (- 5)
At bats: 61 (- 7)
On base percentage: .278 (+ .012)
Slugging percentage: .350 (+ .042)
Batting average: .234 (+ .006)
Runs scored: 6 (even)
Home runs: 1 (even) Bean averaged just under one per season
RBI: 3 (- 5)
(2) Robin Jennings, outfielder, Oakland Athletics (comparing only his AL numbers):
Games played: 20 (- 18) although he played in 28 NL games too
At bats: 52 (- 16)
On base percentage: .273 (+ .007)
Slugging percentage: .308 (even)
Batting average: .250 (+ .022)
Runs scored: 4 (- 2)
Home runs: 0 (- 1)
RBI: 4 (- 4)
(3) Quentin McCracken, outfielder, Minnesota Twins:
Games played: 24 (- 14)
At bats: 64 (- 4)
On base percentage: .275 (+ .009)
Slugging percentage: .313 (+ .005)
Batting average: .219 (- .009)
Runs scored: 7 (+ 1)
Home runs: 3 (+ 3)
RBI: 20 (+ 12)
Again: two of the three most comparable
players have not been on a major league roster in 2001. And McCracken, as with
Mabry in the best-year comparison, is on a different team as he is now a
Diamondback. Think I selected specific players to reach the conclusion I wanted?
You can go to majorleaguebaseball.com, go to the historical stats page and
run your own comparisons. I omitted a player whose 2001 statistics more closely
compare with Bean's career numbers, centerfielder Alex Sanchez of the Milwaukee
Brewers, because he was a rookie in 2001.
My conclusion is simple: Billy
Bean's right. I know these comparisons are not perfect, given the offensive
explosion of the last few years, but I think they put Bean's career into
context. For Bean to have come out, it would have been career suicide. For him.
Players with stats comparable to Bean often do not return to the same team and
likely find themselves out of work from season to season. That's reality. Even
without the whole naked-in-the-shower issue as complicating things.
The
second lesson: if Mabry or McCracken are gay, don't come out either. The water
is ice cold. The atmosphere is poisonous on this planet. It's easy for us to say
that Bean should have been more courageous, but his professional livelihood was
constantly on the line.
Bean Situation Not
Universal
Does that mean it would be professional
suicide for any major league ball player to come out as a gay? Not
exactly.
There are two ballplayers who I occasionally hear rumored to be
gay. I'm not "outing" any of them. I can't. I have no first hand knowledge. I'm
rumor-mongering for the sake of making a point. Would it be professional suicide
for one of them, a terrific infielder, to come out? Every team, no matter how
conservative, has room on its roster for a sure-thing Hall of Famer.
What
about the other, who has played on a World Series winning team? Everybody's
loved him and his teammates showered with him for years. They know he can
exercise the necessary restraint in the locker room.
The lesson is clear.
If you are the fourth of fifth outfielder on your team, you are probably the
most replaceable component on any major league roster. You could be replaced any
day, for any reason. Why risk it?
While it would have been wholly
inappropriate for a marginal major leaguer like Bean to make a spectacle of
coming out, his experience applies only to Billy Bean and other utility
outfielders. Bean made arguably the correct choice for himself and he should not
be criticized for it. But that also means that his deep pessimism is not
warranted in every instance.
Close Window to Return to TBC Web Site