Nando Times
Suit Challenges Nebraska's Ban on Benefits for Gay
State Employees' Partners
By KEVIN O'HANLON, Associated Press
May 1,
2003
LINCOLN, Neb. -
Nebraska's unique constitutional ban on same-sex marriages was challenged by a
federal court lawsuit that says the measure violates the rights of gay couples.
The constitutional amendment, adopted in 2000 after approval by 70
percent of the voters, prevents homosexuals who work for the state or the
University of Nebraska system from sharing health insurance and other benefits
with their partners.
Thirty-four states have so-called "Defense of
Marriage" laws, but Nebraska is the only state whose constitution bans same-sex
couples from enjoying many of the legal protections that heterosexual couples
enjoy, the American Civil Liberties Union said.
"While different-sex
couples may seek and obtain legislation and government employment policies that
protect their domestic partnerships, same-sex couples are prevented from doing
so," the ACLU said.
The ban was spearheaded the Nebraska Coalition for
the Protection of Marriage, which was co-chaired by former Republican Gov. Kay
Orr. It was supported by the Nebraska Family Council, a nonpartisan group that
promotes "biblical values in Nebraska families, school and government."
"I believe the goal is to push the United States Supreme Court to
ultimately redefine marriage," council member Al Riskowski said of the lawsuit.
"The definition of marriage is between one man and one woman. They'd like to see
it go beyond that."
Same-sex marriages are recognized by 11 states and
thousands of companies and more than 150 local governments and agencies
nationwide, according to the lawsuit.
The ACLU said the lawsuit does not
ask for recognition of same-sex marriages, civil unions or domestic
partnerships. Instead, it seeks "nothing more - and nothing less - than a level
playing field."
Close Window to Return to TBC
Web Site